Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldup-lcup-04.txt

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

>Well, I thin that if we believe that certain implementation
>approaches would lead to implementations which would do harm,
>that we should state these beliefs and, where appropriate,
>detail implementation-approach-neutral imperatives of what
>behaviors are considered harmful.  
>
In other words you're suggesting that the specification document that 
implementors
should implement the specification correctly.

>Lack of "eventual convergence data consistency" 
>
What does LCUP currently state?

You're looking for a guarentee from LCUP that the client state be
exactly the same as a server state at some point?

>and/or "overly chattiness" would be harmful.
>
That's implementation defined.

John