Re: LCUP and eventual convergence
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> Thu, 01 May 2003 14:54:49 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 01:24 PM 5/1/2003, Rich Megginson wrote:
>If the current LCUP wording is not sufficient to convey this mandate, then may I ask for a suggestion of how to reword it?
In response to an LCUP request, the server SHALL either:
a) generate the sequence of messages necessary for
eventual convergence of the client's copy of
the content to the server's copy of the content,
b) indicate that a reload is required by returning
lcupReloadRequired, or
c) return an resultCode other than success or
lcupReloadRequired.
Kurt