RE: LDAP Client Update: consideration of alternative proposals

At 08:48 PM 5/28/2003, Chris Apple wrote:
>Does this mean that you agree with Ron's point? Or not?

I don't dispute Ron's point that LCUP (draft-ietf-ldup-lcup)
is meant to provide a simple synchronization tool.  However, I
added that I believe that LDAP-Sync (draft-zeilenga-ldup-sync)
is also meant to provide a simple synchronization tool.  I'll
leave it to Ron to say whether he concurs with my additional
point.



>Chris Apple - Principal Architect
>
>DSI Consulting, Inc.
>
>mailto:[email protected]
>
>http://www.dsi-consulting.com
>
>At 06:07 PM 5/28/2003, Ramsay, Ron wrote:
>>1) LCUP is meant to provide a simple synchronisation tool, similar to
>persistent search.
>
>I content that LDAP-Sync is meant to provide a simple
>synchronization tool, similar to persistent search, as well. The
>primary applications being considered for both solutions is the
>same: meta-directory, address-books, etc..