Request to Reschedule LCUP WG Last Call Milestone
"Chris Apple" <[email protected]> Thu, 29 May 2003 12:12:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Organization | DSI-Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <008701c325fd$3a2df5b0$6500a8c0@D7ST2111> |
Ted & Ned, John and I are requesting that the milestone date for LDUP's WG Last Call for the LCUP deliverable be rescheduled to accommodate consideration of Kurt's recent proposal to the WG. Here is a link to the original posting made by Kurt: http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/msg01754.html Here is a link to a reply from Kurt indicating his agreement with a summarized version of his request posted by myself to the WG mailing list: http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/msg01771.html My best guess for how long it will take us to establish consensus on proceeding as Kurt suggests, as the current charter indicates, or on some other way of proceeding would be near the end of June 2003. If consensus is established for supporting Kurt's proposal and the WG needs to compare, contrast, and discuss the merits of either approach to emerge with one document, I estimate that this might take an additional 2 - 3 months putting the WG Last Call for LCUP somewhere in the Sep-2003 or Oct-2003 time frame. If consensus is re-established for staying with the course that the WG has included in its charter, we should be able to initiate WG Last Call no later than July-2003. I do not know what to say about consensus for some other course of action because the only other one that's been suggested on the mailing list to date is that neither proposal should be progressed if there is insufficient interest expressed in them. So far no one else has agreed with that position. So, I think the most prudent action would be to slip the WG Last Call date for LCUP to July 2003 to enable us to consider Kurt's proposal. If consensus is established on following it, we could request another milestone date change to accommodate the amount of work we believe there is going to be in evaluating the two proposals and settling on one. Chris Apple - Principal Architect DSI Consulting, Inc. mailto:[email protected] http://www.dsi-consulting.com