RE: LDAP Client Update: consideration of alternative proposals

At 08:42 AM 6/15/2003, Chris Apple wrote:
>It is my conclusion as a Co-Chair that the WG has thoroughly
>considered the technical issues relating to its LCUP deliverable.

Thank you for this clarification.

I would like to thank the WG for its consideration of the
technical alternative (draft-zeilenga-ldup-sync) Jong and
I have offered to the WG.

It is our intent to pursue on an individual basis the
publication of our draft as a non-Standard Track RFC.  We
continue to welcome any technical or editorial comment WG
members (or others) might choose to offer.

I also note that not only do we have no objection to the WG
members referencing parts of our document in their future
discussions regarding their deliverable, we have no objection
to the WG borrowing text from our document as the WG deems
appropriate.

Jong and I will likely continue to participate in these
discussions, however, since we are not interested in the
technical approach being taken by the WG, that participation
will likely be limited.

We, of course, reserve the right to raise our concerns
regarding the general suitability of the technical approach
the WG is taken, as well as other comments, at IETF Last Call.

Kurt