RE:
"Chris Apple" <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:40:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Organization | DSI-Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <011901c3977c$c6a92aa0$2213190a@D7ST2111> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C3975B.3F978AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message received. John and I will review the document and get things = moving along. =20 Chris. -----Original Message----- From: Uppili.Srinivasan [mailto:[email protected]]=20 Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 9:42 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject:=20 Drafts Editor - Please publish the attached as draft-ietf-ldup-model-09.txt. LDUPers - Attached is the latest version of the LDUP Profiles draft. I have made = the changes that have been suggested by various reviewers. Most notably, = thanks to Jerry Maziarsky for a detailed review and comments to address areas ambiguity. =20 Per the plan stated in Vienna, I would like to submit this for WG last = call. The following edits have been made in this version of the draft: (1) The relationships between different deployment configurations = (single vs multi-master) and consistency models (synchronous vs asynchronous) are clarified.=20 (2) The architecture spells out that the DITs of replicating directories need not be symmetric. Only the areas under replication need be. =20 (3) A section is added to highlight availability considerations when = nodes are added, deleted or upgraded without adversely affecting total system up-time, since one of the objectives of replication is high = availability.=20 (4) The scope of LDUP is clarified as not for only among homogenous = DSAs (same vendor) but also for heterogeneous DSAs (multi-vendor). Thanks, Uppili Srinivasan=20 ------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C3975B.3F978AA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <TITLE>Message</TITLE> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff background=3D""> <DIV><SPAN class=3D172363902-21102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2>Message received. John and I will review the = document and=20 </FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=3D172363902-21102003><FONT face=3DArial = color=3D#0000ff=20 size=3D2>get things moving along.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D172363902-21102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=3D172363902-21102003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff = size=3D2>Chris.</FONT></SPAN></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV></DIV> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr = align=3Dleft><FONT=20 face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20 Uppili.Srinivasan [mailto:[email protected]] = <BR><B>Sent:</B>=20 Sunday, October 19, 2003 9:42 PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20 [email protected]<BR><B>Cc:</B> [email protected];=20 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];=20 [email protected]<BR><B>Subject:</B> = <BR><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT=20 size=3D2>Drafts Editor -<BR><BR>Please publish the attached as=20 draft-ietf-ldup-model-09.txt.<BR><BR>LDUPers -<BR><BR>Attached is the = latest=20 version of the LDUP Profiles draft. I have made the changes that = have=20 been suggested by various reviewers. Most notably, thanks to Jerry = Maziarsky=20 for a detailed review and comments to address areas = ambiguity. =20 <BR><BR>Per the plan stated in Vienna, I would like to submit this for = WG last=20 call.<BR><BR>The following edits have been made in this version of the = draft:<BR><BR>(1) The relationships between different deployment=20 configurations (single vs multi-master) and consistency models = (synchronous vs=20 asynchronous) are clarified. <BR><BR>(2) The architecture spells out = that the=20 DITs of replicating directories need not be symmetric. Only the = areas=20 under replication need be. <BR><BR>(3) A section is added to = highlight=20 availability considerations when nodes are added, deleted or upgraded = without=20 adversely affecting total system up-time, since one of the objectives = of=20 replication is high availability. <BR><BR>(4) The scope of LDUP is = clarified=20 as not for only among homogenous DSAs (same vendor) but also for = heterogeneous DSAs (multi-vendor).<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Uppili = Srinivasan</FONT>=20 </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_011A_01C3975B.3F978AA0--