LDUP WG Meeting Minutes
"Chris Apple" <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:55:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001101c3c672$6b144dd0$0600a8c0@D7ST2111> |
LDUP WG Meeting Minutes TUESDAY, November 11, 2003 1415-1515 Afternoon Sessions II Rochester APP ldup LDAP Duplication/Replication/Update Protocols WG Kurt Zeilenga volunteered to take notes for the meeting minutes. Chris Apple chaired the meeting and presented the previously circulate meeting agenda. No changes were requested. Chris gave a presentation on the general WG status that concluded with a recommendation from the chairs that WG Last Call for various documents should proceed in a sequence consistent with the order listed in the WG Charter. Chris also pointed out that this would likely be the last IETF Meeting at which LDUP has a need to meet face-to-face. John McMeeking gave a status update of infomod/mrm/protocol I-Ds. Infomod is ready for WG Last Call. Protocol is close to done. MRM needs some more work. Chris Apple noted that the: + Editors of Information and Architectural Models have requested that a last call be initiated + Editors of General Usage Profile document report being ready for WG Last Call + Editors of URP indicate that the document is ready for WG Last Call Ted Hardie pointed out that some documents seem to be missing from the WG Charter page; Chris Apple replied that they were expired and need to be refreshed. Chris presented a proposal for managing WG last Call that was discussed. After identifying a few issues related to dependencies and remaining work to Be done on certain documents, the following schedule was settled upon: + First Grouping: Information and Architectural Model Documents (2 week duration) + Second Grouping: URP and Protocol (3 week duration) + Third Grouping: General Usage Profile and MRM (3 week duration) The original proposal indicated starting WG Last Call for the first grouping on the first Monday after the IETF Last Call. But it was decided in the meeting that this would happen as soon as possible, but not necessarily on that particular day because John McMeeking noted that there may need to be some changes to infomod. draft-ietf-ldup-infomod-08 might be revised prior to WG Last Call. Chris suggested not deferring the WG Last Call if the changes are minor. No concerns were voiced about this. Ted Hardie asked whether the documents should be subject to IETF-wide last call or not. Chris to consider the issue and ask WG (on the mailing list) for input. The meeting concluded.