Re: A philosophical question about large directory structures
Erik Skovgaard <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:12:06 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.lsd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, As per Ella's message earlier, there *is* a central US registration authority. Cheers, ....Erik. ------------------------------- Erik Skovgaard GeoTrain Corp. Enterprise Directories http://www.geotrain.com At 16:46 99/06/24 -0400, Mark C Smith wrote: >Erik Skovgaard wrote: >> ... >> But we are talking about limiting the search here. If the DIT is divided >> into countries, we at least have a good start. > >Okay, I agree. But looking at the problem another way, I don't see how >we can possible get everyone to go through another registration process >in order to run a directory service. Most Internet centric people will >say "But I already have a domain name. What more do I need?" I think >it is foolish to think we can create a registration process for >directory content that has fewer problems than DNS does (forgetting >about cost). It will never get off the ground -- at least not in the >U.S. This is all my opinion of course but history so far is on my side. > >> ... >> >LDAP is sufficient for 2) but not for 1) by itself. Actually, the >> >problem is not with LDAP but, as many others here have pointed out, it >> >is with registering directory services and building a global service. >> >There is no incentive for anyone to do it... and not enough incentive >> >for everyone to play nice together to build it. >> >> Exactly! That has always been our problem. However, with PKI as the >> incentive many countries are actually setting up a name registration >> authority. > >In the U.S., there is no central PKI registration authority as far as I >know. In many countries there is no PKI deployed at all probably. I'd >love for a global PKI to be deployed, but I think the current technology >is neither sufficient nor mature enough. I think the wait will be long >and the costs high. I hope I am wrong about that as Netscape is a PKI >vendor. > >I don't really see where this thread is headed, so I am going to bow out >for now. > >-- >Mark Smith >Directory Architect / Sun-Netscape Alliance >My words are my own, not my employer's. Got LDAP? > >