Re: new ID on LDAP Indexing Service
Bruce Greenblatt <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:33:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.lsd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter, Thanks for the very interesting document. I have a question about index object aggregation (or lack thereof). The CIP architecture indicates that whenever the aggregation, a new CIP object is assumed to have been created at the aggregating server, and referals come back to the aggregating server, and not to the original directory server which created the original index objects. Does this "aggregating" server add too much complexity in your environment? It seems like it ought to be a possibility that you should allow for. Bruce At 11:58 AM 6/25/95 +0200, Peter Gietz wrote: > >Hi, > >FYI I just sent a new informational ID on the LDAP Indexing >Service to [email protected], about which I will give a >presentation at the lsd2 BoF in Oslo. > >Please note that a second document with more technical details >will accompany this one. > >Any comments are most welcome. > >Cheers, >Peter > >_________________________________________________________________ >Peter Gietz >DFN Projekt AMBIX tel: +49 (0)7071 2970336 >Zentrum fuer Datenverarbeitung fax: +49 (0)7073 295131 >Universitaet Tuebingen [email protected] >Wächterstraße 76 >D-72074 Tübingen, Germany >_________________________________________________________________ > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\draft-gietz-ldapindex-00.txt" >