Re: new ID on LDAP Indexing Service

Bruce Greenblatt <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:33:55 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.lsd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Peter,

Thanks for the very interesting document.  I have a question about index
object aggregation (or lack thereof).  The CIP architecture indicates that
whenever the aggregation, a new CIP object is assumed to have been created
at the aggregating server, and referals come back to the aggregating
server, and not to the original directory server which created the original
index objects.  Does this "aggregating" server add too much complexity in
your environment?  It seems like it ought to be a possibility that you
should allow for.

Bruce

At 11:58 AM 6/25/95 +0200, Peter Gietz wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>FYI I just sent a new informational ID on the LDAP Indexing
>Service to [email protected], about which I will give a
>presentation at the lsd2 BoF in Oslo.
>
>Please note that a second document with more technical details
>will accompany this one.
>
>Any comments are most welcome.
>
>Cheers,
>Peter
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Peter Gietz
>DFN Projekt AMBIX                   tel: +49 (0)7071 2970336
>Zentrum fuer Datenverarbeitung      fax: +49 (0)7073 295131
>Universitaet Tuebingen              [email protected]
>Wächterstraße 76                   
>D-72074 Tübingen, Germany 
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\draft-gietz-ldapindex-00.txt"
>