Re: is LDAP-server-finding ldapext or lsd?

The LSD WG is no longer active.

Chris.

RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:

> Ryan Moats wrote:
>
> > This draft replaces draft-moats-ldap-taxonomy-00 as this is now a
> > working group item.
>
> Perhaps someone who was in Oslo (since as far as I can tell there have
> been no ldapext minutes published, and only a one-paragraph version of
> lsd; nudge-nudge) can tell the rest of us about the disposition of the
> finding-ldap-servers topic.  I see that the SRV records topic was on the
> ldapext agenda.
>
> It seems to me that if lsd were a flourishing WG, this topic would be
> squarely in its camp; and that putting it into ldapext likely will take
> some substantial motivation away from actually having a lsd WG.  This may
> not be a bad thing, but it would be nice to know what (if anything) was
> discussed about the relations among this work item and these two
> (one real and one potential) WGs.
>
>  - RL "Bob"

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Apple                     Business Site: AnyWho Directory Service
Internet Directory Group                       http://www.anywho.com
AT&T Labs
[email protected]
+1 973 236 6470                 Tired of slow directories?  Try AnyWho.
------------------------------------------------------------------------