Re: is LDAP-server-finding ldapext or lsd?

> I agree, if LSD2 was a flourishing WG, this draft ought to be in that
> group. 
>
> But, knowing also the uncertainty of whether it will be a WG at all
> I was not prepared to wait. I think the draft ought to be published now
> and since LDAPEXT had it on it's agenda I so no reason for bringing
> it out of there.
> 
> I'm also sure that if LSD2 becomes a WG, Mark and Tim would be more than
> happy to remove the draft from their list of ongoing items if LSD2 would
> like to take it on.

Should LSD2 be chartered I am happy to send this activity there.  Until then, 
LDAPEXT is the most suitable place for it.

Mark Wahl, Directory Product Architect
Innosoft International, Inc.