Re: Service location vs. careless privacy infringement

Well, since the answer to my initial question was essentially `no', I'd
like to look into what we *can* do.  We have security features, we just
need to get people to *use* them for privacy.  For a start, we need the
word privacy in the drafts, not just a list of features that can be used
to achieve it.

I think that should move to [email protected] unless someone protests;
I don't want to spawn a long discussion "crossmailed" over 3 lists.
I'll summarize to the other lists if if there is interest.

--
Hallvard