RE: A philosophical question about large directory structures
"Frode Hernes" <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:09:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.lsd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David, Just noting that all intranets I have set up lately use a private ip range (10.0.0.xxx) and a firewall to fix all problems with the outside world. 8-) Everybody seems to be building their local directories from one organisation's or even one application's need at the moment, maybe the tide will turn and we can start to re-connect, but at the moment I am not very optimistic. But yes, a common namespace (and a common schema for common things) is an important starting point. Frode Hernes TelePost > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > David Chadwick > Sent: 22. juni 1999 21:59 > To: [email protected]; Harald Tveit Alvestrand > Subject: Re: A philosophical question about large directory structures > > > Date sent: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:04:33 +0200 > To: [email protected] > From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> > Subject: A philosophical question about large > directory structures > > > I still wonder: > > It seems that there's a basic assumption that an integrated, world-wide > > directory will occur at some time, but not this year. > > > > My feeling is that it won't happen until someone creates it, and nobody > > will create it until someone wants to pay for it. Up front. > > I dont think this is the main point. I agree with Erik that the main > thing is that there should be a global directory namespace. Then > there will be spontaneous directory connections between > organisations who do business together. And there will be thousands > of these, coming and going all the time. But when you set up your > directory island initially, you do not know who you might want to > connect to in the future. But if you grab a piece of the global > namespace when you set up your directory then you can be > assured of seamlessly connecting to whoever you want to whenever > you want to in the future (providing they have also grabbed a global > name). Its really just the same old argument again of when I set up > my private Intranet do I pick my own IP addresses at will, or do I get > ones from the global set, even though I dont want to connect to the > Internet today. Many a fool has chosen the former route and > regretted years later. (and believe me some people are still doing the > same thing today) > > David > > *************************************************** > > David Chadwick > IT Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT > Tel +44 161 295 5351 Fax +44 161 745 8169 > *NEW* Mobile +44 790 167 0359 *NEW* > Email [email protected] > Home Page http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/chadwick.htm > Understanding X.500 http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/X500.htm > X.500/LDAP Seminars http://www.salford.ac.uk/its024/seminars.htm > Entrust key validation string MLJ9-DU5T-HV8J > > *************************************************** >