RE: A philosophical question about large directory structures
Zahid Ahmed <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:11:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.lsd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DB7662837C64D211BBA600A0C9E91ABF791574@ip5-13.5.20.172.in-addr.arpa> |
How is this related with the D&B number of companies? thanks, Zahid > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave J Woolley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 10:06 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: A philosophical question about large directory > structures > > > > From: Erik Skovgaard [SMTP:[email protected]] > > > > Since the Directory name registration is closely tied to > the legal names > > of > > companies in most countries, I think that makes for a much > better choice. > > > I don't think you can rely on this. At one time domain > names in the UK were tied to legal names, but, once name > registration was privatised, names became a valuable commodity, > and you even got companies buying up names speculatively. > > To guarantee well behaved names in the long term, you really > need legislation or a government agency; formation of the > latter is against the trend in the Western world. > > About the only commercial entities with an interest in > administering a well behaved namespace are people like > Verisign. >