RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt
"Manfredi, Albert E" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma,gmane.ietf.nat.behave |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA7D9B4A761066448304A6AFC09ABDA9015AD234@XCH-NE-1V2.ne.nos.boeing.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Wing [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 7:38 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: 'Behave WG' > Subject: [MBONED] FW: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt > > The BEHAVE working group concluded its WGLC of > draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06 with no comments received. I > would like > MBONED and MAGMA to please take a look at this draft prior to > its submission > to IESG. > > Please send replies to [email protected]. Thanks! http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt: What if the NAPT or NAT device just passed IGMP queries and reports through, changing only the source address of the reports, and let the multicast router outside do all the hard work? I'm wondering whether the IGMP aggregation function is mandatory in NAT/NATP. Bert