RE: Re: [magma] RE: [MBONED] FW: WGLC:draft-ietf-behave-multicast-06.txt
"Dan Wing" <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:08:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nat.behave,gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > It is an idea regarding the BEHAVE Internet Draft and how > > the multicast > > NAPT can allow outside multicast routers to uniquely > > identify different > > multicast SSM channels (S,G) coming from inside interfaces > > in the case > > two inside interfaces use the same multicast group. > > How prevalent do people expect the scenario of a SSM sender being > located behind a NAPT? Not very prevalent with today's broadcast model for SSM where the broadcaster is the video service provider. However, we don't want to encourage proliferation of NATs which are compliant with a BCP that do not allow SSM senders behind those NATs. With today's bandwidth to the home we might consider someone running a 'radio station' from behind a NAT. With tomorrow's bandwidth, we might considering someone doing video sharing to their family from behind a NAT. Hard to say; I would like to do this once if we know how to do it today. > > In the BEHAVE draft, REQ-4, if there is a host on the > > inside interface > > sending UDP packets to a multicast group, the NAPT can > > change the source > > address and the port but not the multicast group address. > > In this way, I > > think the outside routers can not differentiate the two > > channels because > > they have the same source (the public interface) and the > > same multicast > > group address. > > > > Is it possible for the NAPT to have multiple external addresses to use > as source addresses? Some NAPTs do that, yes -- larger ones used by service providers and by enterprises. Your traditional residential-class NAPT doesn't do that, though. > > Allowing the NAPT to change the multicast group address in > > the case two > > sender behind the NAPT use the same group address in a > > similar way the > > NATP changes a UDP port is a possible solution. There are other > > possibilities. > > From the global perspective, how does a receiver outside the > NAPT know the (S,G) combination to join? -d > Regards, > Brian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Behave mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave