When IGMPv3 router in EXCLUDE(X, Y) state receives TO_IN(A)
"Rohan Sen" <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:16:45 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, RFC 3376 Section 6.4.2 change state record handling router state machine last line mentions about sending a group specific query in addition to the source specific query. I am not very sure if I am able to understand the necessity of this group specific query. Usually a TO_IN(A) message is received from a host that underwent a state change from EXCLUDE(A) to INCLUDE(A) which means the router already had a state of EXCLUDE(X,Y) where A is a subset of Y. The router then tries to find out if there is any host which still has interest in receiving traffic for the sources already having source timer > 0. I do not understand what is the use of sending a group specific query in this case since the group specific query has a wider scoped purpose than the source specific query. Could it be that since for other cases no query is sent if sources to be queried is NULL set, for this case only (since TO_IN(NULL) is the IGMPv3 translation for IGMPv2 Leave when older version host for that group is present) a group specific query has to be sent regardless of whether the to be queried source set is NULL or not. Any help on these lines would be highly appreciated. -- thanks, Rohan Sen _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma