Re: Question about Building and Sending Group and Source Specific Queries ( RFC 3376, section 6.6.3.2)
Bharat Joshi <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:22:08 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Organization | Infosys Technologies Ltd |
| Message-ID | <1214884328.6132.6.camel@magadha> |
Hi, > Sorry, I still have some questions about it. It is fine. > The RFC 3376 says that "The first one has the "Suppress Router-Side > Processing" bit set and contains all the > sources with retransmission state and timers greater than LMQT." > > So I guess that the first query's S bit will always be set. > But I think that the first query's S bit should not be set, and the > second query's S bit should be set, and I think it's more reasonable. I think the confusion is coming when you look only at this text. But if you also keep in mind when the query will have "Suppress Router-Side Processing" bit set, things will be clearer. As RFC 3376 says: << When transmitting a group specific query, if the group timer is larger than LMQT, the "Suppress Router-Side Processing" bit is set in the query message. >> So for first query, we would have lowered down group timer to LMQT for all groups being queried so that can not be larger than LMQT and so "Suppress Router-Side Processing" can not be set. So now when will group timer be larger than LMQT when generating a group-source specific query? Only when router has received a report for a specific group. So in that case, it creates two queries, one with 'S' Bit flag set and list of group-source which has timer higher than LMQT and another one with 'S' bit unset and list of group-source which has timer lower than LMQT. I hope this is clear now. Thanks, Bharat > Any response will be highly appreciated > > kuzi > > 2008/6/30 Bharat Joshi <[email protected]>: > > > > > First group and source specific query's S bit will never be set. This is mentioned for the subsequent queries where a response might have been received. In that case, it generates two queries, one with the sources for which it does not want non-querier to reduce its timers and another with those for which it wants the non-querier to reduce their timers. > > > > This is done for those sources for which are heard in the responses. > > > > Thanks, > > Bharat > > **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***