Re: IGMP Snooping on VPLS
Brian Haberman <[email protected]> Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:24:01 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sriram, Venkatesh Sriram wrote: > Hi Prashant, > > Thanks for the reply. > > Lets assume that i recieve an IGMP Query message from one of my > customer ports. In that case, the snooping switch should also > recognize that port as the router port. Is my understanding correct? In general, that is one way to identify a multicast router port. However, it is dependent upon the deployment. If you are supporting multiple customers and you don't want to mix their traffic, then simply marking ports where queries received as router ports is probably not sufficient. > > If so, then i should be forwarding all IGMP membership reports on the > PW and this particular customer port. I am not completely up-to-speed on VPLS, but I would think that you don't want to blindly forward one customer's Reports to another customer's multicast router. Regards, Brian > > The same holds true for the second point also. > > Is my understand correct here too? > > Thanks, > Sriram > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes your understanding seems to be right for both points. >> >> >> Regards, >> Prashant Jhingran >> www.cisco.com >> Phone: +91-80-442 61800 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Venkatesh Sriram >> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 8:51 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [magma] IGMP Snooping on VPLS >> >> Hi, >> >> I was reading RFC 4541 and i have a few doubts. I would really >> appreciate if somebody could help me clear those. >> >> According to Section 2.1.11 - "A snooping switch should forward IGMP >> Membership Reports only to those ports where multicast routers are >> attached." >> >> I understand that this would mean that a snooping switch should send all >> IGMP Membership Reports that it receives from its customer ports on to >> the pseudowire (PW) that connects this switch to the other PE routers. >> Is this correct? >> >> According to 2.1.2. Data Forwarding Rules - " 1) Packets with a >> destination IP address outside 224.0.0.X which are not IGMP should be >> forwarded according to group-based port membership tables and must also >> be forwarded on router ports." >> >> Does this mean that a snooping switch should forward packets with dest >> IP outside 224.0.0.X (which are not IGMP) only on the ports over which >> it has recvd a prior IGMP report + the PW that conects it to other PE >> routers? >> >> Thank You, >> >> Sriram >> _______________________________________________ >> magma mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma >> > _______________________________________________ > magma mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma