Re: IGMPv4
"Alvaro Fernandez" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:58:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi I think there are issues with IGMPv3. I suggested IGMPv4 some time ago. I think that some issues are: 1. Mixing include and exclude sources -> information of sources of SSM (source specific multicast) is lost when mixing and PIM router can not use SSM 2. Separating include / exclude -> group timer and exclude list are not neccessary 3. No exclude list -> all the timers of exclude sources =0 -> no need for timers in exclude sources 4. No need for timers in Include sources when the routers keeps information of every host and channel -> no include timers (the reason is in GMI) 5. no exclude timers + no include timers -> timers are not necessary -> everything is much simpler, 1,2,3,4,5 -> the state machine of the router is decribed with 8 lines (without source timers, group timers, exclude lists and Q(G,S)) regards Alvaro PS. BCP79/ more than 10 applications filed in USPTO / first one will be isued in 12 days. -----Mensaje original----- De: [email protected] en nombre de Indranil Bhattacharya Enviado el: jue 17/12/2009 8:16 Para: Bharat Joshi CC: [email protected] Asunto: Re: [magma] IGMPv4 Thanks Brian and Bharat. No, I do not see any issue. I just asked. Regards, Indranil On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Bharat Joshi <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > Though there are no proposals for IGMPv4 right now but a good effort to > simplify the IGMPv3/MLDv2 protocol is going on in MBONED. You can take a > look at tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2 > > BTW, do you see any issues in current version of IGMP/MLD because of > which you are asking for the next version? > > Thanks, > Bharat > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian > Haberman [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:21 AM > To: Indranil Bhattacharya > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [magma] IGMPv4 > > Indranil Bhattacharya wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there work going on IGMPV4/MLDV3? Where can I find documents > > on this? > > > > There are no proposals for additional work on IGMP or MLD. > > Regards, > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > magma mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma > _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma