Re: MLDv2 router in the presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners

"K.Kawaguchi" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:42:51 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.magma
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Indranil-san, Kunal-san,

Thank you for the answers.
I understood.

>                                 Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a
> possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present
> in the LAN, this will not be acceptable.

Best Regards
--
Kiyoaki Kawaguchi



"Indranil Bhattacharya <[email protected]>" wrote:

> 
> Hi Kiyoaki Kawaguchi,
> 
>                                 Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a
> possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present
> in the LAN, this will not be acceptable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Indranil
> 
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM, K.Kawaguchi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a simple question for MLDv2 interoperation with MLDv1.
> >
> >
> > RFC3810
> > ---
> > 8.3.  Multicast Router Behavior
> >
> > 8.3.2.  In the Presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners
> >
> >   MLDv2 BLOCK messages are ignored, as are source-lists in TO_EX()
> >   messages (i.e., any TO_EX() message is treated as TO_EX( {} )).  On
> >   the other hand, the Querier continues to send MLDv2 queries,
> >   regardless of its Multicast Address Compatibility Mode.
> > ---
> >
> >
> > Is the follwing a correct right too?
> >
> >   "Any IS_EX() message is treated as IS_EX( {} )."
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > --
> > Kiyoaki Kawaguchi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > magma mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>