Re: MLDv2 router in the presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners
"K.Kawaguchi" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:42:51 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Indranil-san, Kunal-san, Thank you for the answers. I understood. > Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a > possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present > in the LAN, this will not be acceptable. Best Regards -- Kiyoaki Kawaguchi "Indranil Bhattacharya <[email protected]>" wrote: > > Hi Kiyoaki Kawaguchi, > > Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a > possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present > in the LAN, this will not be acceptable. > > Thanks, > Indranil > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM, K.Kawaguchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a simple question for MLDv2 interoperation with MLDv1. > > > > > > RFC3810 > > --- > > 8.3. Multicast Router Behavior > > > > 8.3.2. In the Presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners > > > > MLDv2 BLOCK messages are ignored, as are source-lists in TO_EX() > > messages (i.e., any TO_EX() message is treated as TO_EX( {} )). On > > the other hand, the Querier continues to send MLDv2 queries, > > regardless of its Multicast Address Compatibility Mode. > > --- > > > > > > Is the follwing a correct right too? > > > > "Any IS_EX() message is treated as IS_EX( {} )." > > > > > > Best Regards > > -- > > Kiyoaki Kawaguchi > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > magma mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma > > > > > > >