Re: Destination address in v2 leave message
Indranil Bhattacharya <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:43:04 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAaur96cbLtKD1gFiTJtbr6ukxsRw823uQVWEC4_DORaheQ_XA@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============5273828227468307945== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207 --0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Bharat. - Indranil On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Bharat Joshi <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Kunal/Indranil, > > Leave message is sent to ALL-Routers address because host does not > keep track of the querier. > > If host needs to keep track of querier, it will have to implement > querier election algorithm and maintain a state with querier-timeout etc. > which is unnecessary. > > Regards, > Bharat > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Indranil Bhattacharya [[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:05 AM > To: Kunal Shah > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message > > Hi Kunal, > > Non-queriers lower the group timers upon receiving > group-specific query from querier. They always ignore leave messages. Please > refer the last state diagram in section 7 which is for non-querier. > > Thanks, > Indranil > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the > non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the > packet * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer > to section 7 of RFC 2236. > > ________________________________ > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of > Indranil Bhattacharya > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message > > Hi, > > Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as > destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending > it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway. > > Thanks, > Indranil > > > **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** > This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended > solely > for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, > please > notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you > are not > to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other > person and > any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has > taken > every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for > any damage > you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry > out your > own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves > the > right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from > this e-mail > address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the > Infosys e-mail system. > ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** > --0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div>Thanks Bharat.</div> <div>=A0</div> <div>- Indranil<br><br></div> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Bharat Joshi <s= pan dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">bharat_josh= [email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex= ; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">Hi Kunal/Indranil,<br><br>=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 Leave message is sent to ALL-Routers address because host does = not keep track of the querier.<br> <br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 If host needs to keep track of querier, it will have to= implement querier election algorithm and maintain a state with querier-tim= eout etc. which is unnecessary.<br><br>Regards,<br>Bharat<br>______________= __________________________<br> From: <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> = [<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>] On B= ehalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya [<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"= >[email protected]</a>]<br> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:05 AM<br>To: Kunal Shah<br>Cc: <a href=3D"= mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>Subject: Re: [magma] Destinati= on address in v2 leave message<br> <div class=3D"im"><br>Hi Kunal,<br><br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Non-queriers = lower the group timers upon receiving group-specific query from querier. Th= ey always ignore leave messages. Please refer the last state diagram in sec= tion 7 which is for non-querier.<br> <br>Thanks,<br>Indranil<br><br></div> <div class=3D"im">On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <<a href= =3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><mailto:<= a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>>&g= t; wrote:<br> Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the non-qu= erier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the pack= et * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer to= section 7 of RFC 2236.<br> <br>________________________________<br></div>From: <a href=3D"mailto:magma= [email protected]">[email protected]</a><mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:m= [email protected]">[email protected]</a>> [mailto:<a href=3D"ma= ilto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><mailto:<a href= =3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>>] On Behal= f Of Indranil Bhattacharya<br> <div class=3D"im">Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM<br></div>To: <a= href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><mailto:<a href=3D"mai= lto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>><br> <div class=3D"im">Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message<= br><br>Hi,<br><br>=A0 =A0Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of usin= g queriers address as destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any= advantage of sending it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave me= ssage anyway.<br> <br>Thanks,<br>Indranil<br><br><br></div>**************** CAUTION - Disclai= mer *****************<br>This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL I= NFORMATION intended solely<br>for the use of the addressee(s). If you are n= ot the intended recipient, please<br> notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you a= re not<br>to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to a= ny other person and<br>any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may conta= in viruses. Infosys has taken<br> every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for an= y damage<br>you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You sh= ould carry out your<br>own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attach= ment. Infosys reserves the<br> right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from thi= s e-mail<br>address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be st= ored on the<br>Infosys e-mail system.<br>***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaim= er ********INFOSYS***<br> </blockquote></div><br> --0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207-- --===============5273828227468307945== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma --===============5273828227468307945==--