Re: Destination address in v2 leave message

Indranil Bhattacharya <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:43:04 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.magma
Message-ID <CAAaur96cbLtKD1gFiTJtbr6ukxsRw823uQVWEC4_DORaheQ_XA@mail.gmail.com>
--===============5273828227468307945==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207

--0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks Bharat.

- Indranil

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Bharat Joshi <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Kunal/Indranil,
>
>         Leave message is sent to ALL-Routers address because host does not
> keep track of the querier.
>
>         If host needs to keep track of querier, it will have to implement
> querier election algorithm and maintain a state with querier-timeout etc.
> which is unnecessary.
>
> Regards,
> Bharat
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Indranil Bhattacharya [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:05 AM
> To: Kunal Shah
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
>
> Hi Kunal,
>
>            Non-queriers lower the group timers upon receiving
> group-specific query from querier. They always ignore leave messages. Please
> refer the last state diagram in section 7 which is for non-querier.
>
> Thanks,
> Indranil
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the
> non-querier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the
> packet * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer
> to section 7 of RFC 2236.
>
> ________________________________
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of
> Indranil Bhattacharya
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message
>
> Hi,
>
>    Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of using queriers address as
> destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any advantage of sending
> it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave message anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> Indranil
>
>
> **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
> This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended
> solely
> for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient,
> please
> notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you
> are not
> to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other
> person and
> any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has
> taken
> every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for
> any damage
> you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry
> out your
> own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves
> the
> right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from
> this e-mail
> address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
> Infosys e-mail system.
> ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
>

--0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>Thanks Bharat.</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>- Indranil<br><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Bharat Joshi <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">bharat_josh=
[email protected]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex=
; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">Hi Kunal/Indranil,<br><br>=A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 Leave message is sent to ALL-Routers address because host does =
not keep track of the querier.<br>
<br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 If host needs to keep track of querier, it will have to=
 implement querier election algorithm and maintain a state with querier-tim=
eout etc. which is unnecessary.<br><br>Regards,<br>Bharat<br>______________=
__________________________<br>
From: <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> =
[<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>] On B=
ehalf Of Indranil Bhattacharya [<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"=
>[email protected]</a>]<br>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:05 AM<br>To: Kunal Shah<br>Cc: <a href=3D"=
mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>Subject: Re: [magma] Destinati=
on address in v2 leave message<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>Hi Kunal,<br><br>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Non-queriers =
lower the group timers upon receiving group-specific query from querier. Th=
ey always ignore leave messages. Please refer the last state diagram in sec=
tion 7 which is for non-querier.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Indranil<br><br></div>
<div class=3D"im">On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Kunal Shah &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&lt;mailto:<=
a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;&g=
t; wrote:<br>
Non-querier does process the leave message. On receiving a leave the non-qu=
erier is going to reduce the group timer to [Max Response Time] in the pack=
et * [Last Member Query Count] but will not send the leave. Please refer to=
 section 7 of RFC 2236.<br>
<br>________________________________<br></div>From: <a href=3D"mailto:magma=
[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&lt;mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:m=
[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; [mailto:<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&lt;mailto:<a href=
=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;] On Behal=
f Of Indranil Bhattacharya<br>

<div class=3D"im">Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:30 AM<br></div>To: <a=
 href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&lt;mailto:<a href=3D"mai=
lto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;<br>
<div class=3D"im">Subject: [magma] Destination address in v2 leave message<=
br><br>Hi,<br><br>=A0 =A0Can anyone please tell me the disadvantage of usin=
g queriers address as destination address in v2 leave message? Is there any=
 advantage of sending it to 224.0.0.2? Non-querier never processes leave me=
ssage anyway.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Indranil<br><br><br></div>**************** CAUTION - Disclai=
mer *****************<br>This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL I=
NFORMATION intended solely<br>for the use of the addressee(s). If you are n=
ot the intended recipient, please<br>
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you a=
re not<br>to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to a=
ny other person and<br>any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may conta=
in viruses. Infosys has taken<br>
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for an=
y damage<br>you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You sh=
ould carry out your<br>own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attach=
ment. Infosys reserves the<br>
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from thi=
s e-mail<br>address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be st=
ored on the<br>Infosys e-mail system.<br>***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaim=
er ********INFOSYS***<br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--0016e643452caf1fe604af39a207--

--===============5273828227468307945==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
magma mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma

--===============5273828227468307945==--