Re: IGMPv3 for really dumb hosts

> Actually, I did a quick review of Hui's draft, but unfortunately I
> could not agree several interpretation, because it seems the draft
> proposes different protocol bahaviors and different usage of the
> record types, which implies something new protocol and includes
> difficulties for the interoperability with the full version.

I would like to know details of the compatibilty problem you addressed.
Thanks! 
> Hitoshi Asaeda
> 
> _______________________________________________
> magma mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>