Re: IGMP report suppression
Christy L Norman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.magma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF439A98A5.B58C3B22-ON8625721B.007AE772-8625721B.007C5272@us.ibm.com> |
I agree with the answer to Parit's question. IGMPv1 and v2 reports can be suppressed to reduce unnecessary traffic. However, in regards to the reason for the absence of report suppression in v3 - I believe it is due to the presence of sources in an IGMPv3 report. One record could easily be omitted from a report (record suppression?). All listeners to a group may have different sources making up their per-interface states and to check the sources of all hosts' reports would be a bit of work for the host. In addition to this reason, RFC 2236 states in 5.2, "Instead of using a single interface timer, implementations are recommended to spread transmission of such Report messages over the interval (0, [Max Resp Time])." In this case, the operation will be much like IGMPv1 & v2 - but report suppression isn't required if you happen to be implementing that method of reporting - because of the issue with the sources. Do you agree? - Christy Princy Elizabeth <[email protected]> 11/02/2006 11:32 PM To P K S <[email protected]>, [email protected] cc Subject Re: [magma] IGMP report suppression IGMP V1 and V2 reports are sent per group. Consider a LAN with 10 hosts each interested in the same 10 groups. If reports suppression were not employed, every Query interval there would be 10 reports sent out by each of the 10 hosts ==> 100 reports which unnecessarily increase the traffic on the LAN. For the router, it is sufficient to know that there is one interested member for a group on the LAN. So 1 report per group would have sufficed. This precisely is what is done through report suppression. In IGMP V3, a single report can contain the report for all the groups a host is interested in. Thus there is no need for report suppression here since the number of reports would be generally, equal to the number of hosts only. I hope that clarifies your query. - Princy P K S <[email protected]> wrote: Why is the IGMP report suppression required in the first place? Regards Parit _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the new Yahoo.com _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma _______________________________________________ magma mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma