draft-ietf-malloc-malloc-mib-07.txt
"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.malloc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 18 May 2002, C. M. Heard wrote: > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Dave Thaler wrote: > > I just submitted draft -06. [ ... ] > > Detailed responses to MIB doctor review comments below. > [ ... ] > I believe that there is an error in the following response: > > > 13) Mike Heard: > > > mallocScopeNameLangName OBJECT-TYPE > > > SYNTAX LanguageTag (SIZE(1..92)) > > > + -- REVIEWER's note: if I have counted correctly, this restriction > > > + -- results in a maximum OID length of 126 sub-identifiers for the > > > + -- accessible object instances in this table. OK if that's as > > intended. [ ... ] > > Changed 92 to 95. > > I think this should be 94. Note that libsmi-0.3.1 complains that the > index may overflow [ ... ]. I see that -07 (which has been posted but not yet announced) changes 95 to 94. The MIB compiler is now happy, so this issue is closed. I did, however, also see (in both the MALLOC-MIB and the IANA-MALLOC-MIB modules) that the LAST-UPDATED and REVISION clauses of the MODULE-IDENTITY invocations don't match as they should. If this is not being too pedantic, may I suggest asking the RFC Editor to fix this prior to publication (e.g., by putting in the date & time when IANA-assigned numbers are entered). Regards, Mike