Re: Manet Meeting Agenda items
Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnDZ89t+jZ8=r+x25mD1ewzzXfmBgF_DVuC5UqhyJysABbeVw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Don, I am interested in contributing in draft for MANET Reactive Routing, and another as informational draft that updates RFC2501. I would like to give a presentation if possible for this for 10 minutes. The items in the agenda below does not have expected durations. On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 4:33 PM Don Fedyk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > > > Call for any additional meeting agenda items. > > > > So far we have: > > - DLEP Documents status. > > > - > - Charter discussion (summary of mailing list discussion and interim > meeting). > - Hybrid Protocol combinations > - OLSRv2 maintenance (Other MANET Maintenance) > > I think this will need maybe 20 minutes > > - > - Henning Rogge documents > > > - > > > > As noted, before we need commitment from people to work on any new (and > existing) charter items and so far, the response has been very light. > We need to discuss this also as you mentioned it now. For my opinion the reasons can be that in past there were commitments before for AODVv2 and that manet_reactive item was deleted with no clear discussions/AD_clarification, so there are possibilities that community is not not able to understand/to_know how the past_ietf_management_and_future do adding wg_item and deleting within IETF WG. Therefore, I hope ADs discuss reasons for light responds and clarify that wg_item deletion. Best Regards AB _______________________________________________ manet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet