Re: Manet Meeting Agenda items

Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.manet
Message-ID <CADnDZ89t+jZ8=r+x25mD1ewzzXfmBgF_DVuC5UqhyJysABbeVw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Don,

I am interested in contributing in draft for MANET Reactive Routing, and
another as informational draft that updates RFC2501. I would like to give a
presentation if possible for this for 10 minutes. The items in the agenda
below does not have expected durations.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 4:33 PM Don Fedyk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
>
> Call for any additional meeting agenda items.
>
>
>
> So far we have:
>
>    - DLEP Documents status.
>
>

>    -
>    - Charter discussion (summary of mailing list discussion and interim
>    meeting).
>       - Hybrid Protocol combinations
>       - OLSRv2 maintenance (Other MANET Maintenance)
>
>
I think this will need maybe 20 minutes

>
>    -
>    - Henning Rogge documents
>
>

>    -
>
>
>
> As noted, before we need commitment from people to work on any new (and
> existing) charter items and so far, the response has been very light.
>

We need to discuss this also as you mentioned it now.
For my opinion the reasons can be that in past there were commitments
before for AODVv2 and that manet_reactive item was deleted with no clear
discussions/AD_clarification, so there are possibilities that community is
not not able to understand/to_know  how the past_ietf_management_and_future
do adding wg_item and deleting within IETF WG. Therefore, I hope ADs
discuss reasons for light responds and clarify that wg_item deletion.

Best Regards
AB

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.