Re: AODVv2 implementation

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 4:32 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Charlie,
>
> > I do not have an implementation.
>
> It is my understanding that Henning has concerns about the implementability
> of AODVv2.  Given Henning's track record, I recommend that we should not
> dismiss his concerns.
>

I agree that we review/comment_on draft as author request within ietf-wg. I
don't remember that there was review from him regarding one
wg-aodvv2-draft, however, it is more better that comments are related to WG
drafts or individual drafts, because discussing generally is not understood
by me.


> > I feel confident that an efficient implementation is very doable.
>
> At first sight, this appears to contradict what Henning told me.  Since
> both of you are world-class specialists, there's obviously something that
> I don't understand.
>
> Could you please explain what it is exactly that I'm missing?
>

IMHO, we need to explain things within wg-list pointing to implementations,
documents or presentations submitted to the meetings or discuss-lists. If
some one have done an implementation for AODV with errors then they MUST
report to this WG, but so far there is no error reported so far. So we
cannot explain what some participant did not implement but he/she is
commenting_to_authors of something is missing without pointing to
cod_or_doc.

Best Wishes
AB


_______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet