Re: AODVv2 implementation

> for our use case, reactive routing would make more sense in terms of
> topology changes.

That's interesting.  Why do you think reactive routing would be more
sensible in your case?

> To get to the point, someone with muscle and money needs to step up. 

It could be a university project, in which case costs would go down
dramatically.  But you'd still need to convince a competent university
person that there exists a potential AODVv2 community, and that means
understanding where people might want to use AODVv2 in preference to, say,
OLSRv2 or Babel.

-- Juliusz