Re: AODVv2 implementation
Henning Rogge <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGnRvuqZbOBGS111eutfic50g7S0_QM+LpFQ7MAf7JWqK5STwg@mail.gmail.com> |
Most AODV implementations I got a hint on had a custom kernel module... for something like Kernel 2.4.x. Henning Rogge On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 10:29 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> For detecting a route request for a non-existing route my idea always > >>> was to use a TUN device and point a route to the whole MANET (or even > >>> the default route) into it. > > > > That's going to work, but it pushes every packet through two kernel-user > > > transitions, which makes it unsuitable for production use. > > > As soon as you set a more specific route, the traffic will not go into > > the TUN anymore. > > Ah, so instead of pushing all traffic through userspace, as I envisioned, > you use the TUN hack for unknown destinations, but establish normal kernel > routes or known destinations. I see, that's why you need a way to monitor > which routes are being actively used. > > Charlie, could you please tell us which of these two techniques is the one > that you envision, and tell us what's the bit that we're still missing? > > -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ manet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet