Discussion of WG charter draft

Hi All,

This is a draft of my understanding/update on the re-charter proposal with
related discussions of previous meetings/list_comments,

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The WG Charter Proposal:

Updating MANET use case work
Proactive Routing: OLSRv2 development work
DLEP development work
Multicast Implementation and defining problems to be solved
Reactive Routing: AODVv2 implementation and adoption (check ref [2] [3])
Reactive Routing: DSRv2 implementation

Milestones:
- The DLEP drafts are updated and will be submitted to IESG.
- Implementations of experimental WG RFCs

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

My understanding from previous discussions and last meeting [1]:
- There are three drafts requesting for this WG adoption but still waiting
(draft are now dated expired)
- I proposed evaluation of all MANET experimental RFCs within last meeting
- I proposed update of RFC2501 and write a draft for MANET use cases within
last meeting.
- There are some suggestions to develop RFC7181/OLSRv2 for future if there
are demand (some comments on list from participants).
- The AODVv2 draft is requesting WG adoption
- There is interest and welling from Charlie to work on AODVv2 (with
submitted draft, and presentation for this meeting)
- Two participants requesting that new work to be implemented in open
source software (OSS) (e.g. as willingness of participation of
implementation in OSS is not clear in this WG).
- There is interest and welling from me to work on manet use cases and
technologies (mentioned in meeting, work in progress, not yet submitted
draft_00)
- There is interest and welling from Ronald to work on manet multicast
(mentioned in meeting, and not yet submitted draft_00), even though there
was some comments in the last meeting from one participant that
manet_muticast has problems.
- There is interest and welling from me to work on DSRv2 (mentioned in
meeting, and not yet submitted draft), also interest and welling to
implement.
- The Babel protocol development and new_work to be included and there are
wellings to support as participants of their WG joined with MANET WG.
- No clear interest from the WG on hybrid routing, but there was some
discussions on the list.

+++++++++++++++++++

References:

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-118-manet/
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/qEyyrWc6rKkcHlk2JGU1cF-wo2Q/
[3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Nr6cgHgSU17PoSqHuFCfxCBwRyc/

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet