[manet] Comments on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-radio-band-00

Don Fedyk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.manet
Message-ID <PH7PR14MB5368E229D0A5D5A6DB1BD055BBAB2@PH7PR14MB5368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Henning

I reviewed this draft. My main comments.

I got lost on the description of center frequence and carrier frequency both terms are used once.   The description of the extension TLV needs to match the text in the TLV.
The bandwidth element is missing a description. What are the units bits/sec ?

The use of uplink and downlink terminology versus Transmit and receive.  Why not just use Transmit and Receive everywhere? From link interface that seems less confusing ?

Also, In my opinion this draft could do with a small example appendix. I'm guessing a simple radio for a single link would have two TLVs,  one for each the transmit and receive direction. Each TLV would have a different frequency but comparable bandwidths? Is that how  a symmetric link would look?  Or are many TLVs  with different frequencies in the same direction typical for even the most basic link?

Thanks
Don

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.