[manet] Re: Proposed tweaks to charter text

Thanks, Ronald.

>> OLD: The main advantage of reactive solutions is low protocol overhead.
>> 
>> NEW: (remove this sentence)

> Sentence removed. However, does this mean that you are of the opinion that
> reactive ad hoc routing protocols will under no circumstances have an
> advantage over pro-active ad hoc routing protocols?

Not at all, I'm keeping an open mind.  I'm simply of the opinion that the
debate is still open, and that the charter is not the right place to take
a side.

>> OLD: The WG will explore multicast routing solutions in support of
>>      heterogeneous wireless technology configurations and federated mobile
>>      ad hoc networks.
>> 
>> NEW: The WG will explore multicast routing solutions that are applicable
>>      in mobile ad-hoc networks and heterogeneous network topologies.
>> 

> Applied, although I was rather attached to the "federated mobile ad hoc
> networks" formulation.

Feel free to reinstate, I don't have a strong opinion on this point.

Thanks,

-- Juliusz

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]