[manet] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-tra ffic-classification-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <173861893600.126537.15326324048081726617@dt-datatracker-6f7f8bdd64-25rl2> |
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-13: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 5.2 defines a registry which includes code points with an allocation policy of Specification Required. Implicit in policy is the review of a designated expert (DE). However, this document does not provide guidance to the DE on what to approve. See Sections 4.5 and 4.6 of RFC8126. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 2. Editorial. The Traffic Classification Data Item represents a list of flows that may be used at the same time for traffic sent from a router to a modem. "Used at the same time" to do what? ** Section 2.1 When an extension requires use of this Data Item the Traffic Classification Data Item SHOULD be included by a modem in any Session Initialization Response Message -- Are “Data Item” and “Traffic Classification Data Item” the same data item? -- What is the alternative to using his Data Item in a Session Initialization Response Message? ** Section 5.2. Should the new registry defined in this section have an additional column which is a reference to a document which provides further details? _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]