[manet] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet- dlep-da-credit-extension-20: (with COMMENT)
Donald Eastlake <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF4+nEE+b-nATr1TaqCmcQLy4bNbMA3pHYn4t7_ZfEwYzqtCTw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Deb, On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 3:26 PM Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-20: No Objection > > ... > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 4: If changes are made to update the Security Consideration sections > of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification and > draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control, I recommend this draft reference one > or both of those drafts. Ok. > Section 4: Wildcards are literally mentioned only in the Introduction and > here. I certainly don't mind the recommendation in this section, but should > this be a standalone paragraph? And should it appear in some/all of the other > drafts in the group? Gunter's wording suggestions include splitting that paragraph. We can check other drafts. > Section 4, last sentence: Does this apply to the wildcard topic? Or something > else, maybe the second sentence? I think this section could use some > restructuring. Also addressed by Gunter's wording suggestions. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA [email protected] _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]