[manet] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet- dlep-ether-credit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Donald Eastlake <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.manet
Message-ID <CAF4+nEEgVV62FRugx0E=+pf8fXQZKS=teRNgeVWW5Yn65GnYpA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Deb,

On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 3:25 PM Deb Cooley via Datatracker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-08: No Objection
>
> ...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Section 4:  If changes are made to update the Security Consideration sections
> of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification and
> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control, I recommend this draft reference one
> or both of those drafts.

Ok.

> Section 4:  Wildcards are literally mentioned only in the Introduction and
> here. I certainly don't mind the recommendation in this section, but should
> this be a standalone paragraph?  And should it appear in some/all of the other
> drafts in the group?
>

Gunter's wording suggestions include splitting that paragraph. We can
check other drafts.

> Section 4, last sentence:  Does this apply to the wildcard topic?  Or something
> else, maybe the second sentence?  I think this section could use some
> restructuring.

Also addressed by Gunter's wording suggestions.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 [email protected]

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.