[manet] Re: Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ie tf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-13: (with COMMENT)

Sounds as a correct observation about the square brackets Donald.

Be well,
G/

-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2025 3:24 AM
To: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) <[email protected]>
Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-13: (with COMMENT)


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.



Hi Gunter,

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:32 PM Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-13: No Objection
>
> ...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # Gunter Van de Velde, RTG AD, comments for
> draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-13
>
> # The line numbers used are rendered from IETF idnits tool:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/arch
> ive/id/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-13.txt
>
> # Many thanks to Darren Dukes for the RTGDIR review follow up.
>
> # Detailed Review
> # ===============
>
> 315                       0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
> 316                     +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 317                     |         DSCP          |  MBZ  |
> 318                     +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 319
> 320                       DSCP: Differentiated Services Codepoint
> 321                       MBZ:  MUST be zero
>
> GV> This reads odd. Why the uppercase "MUST" and then all lower case "be zero"
> instead of "Be Zero". What most the device do when MBZ happens to be not zero?
> Same MBZ observation applies to line402 of the document. What about 
> the
> following:
>
> "
> DSCP: Differentiated Services Codepoint (RFC 2474).
> MBZ: Must Be Zero MUST be set to zero when transmitted. Receivers MUST 
> ignore this field upon reception. "

Thanks for the suggested wording change which looks good to me except that I think the [RFC2474] reference should use square bacets.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA  [email protected]
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]