[manet] Andy Newton's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traff ic-classification-14: (with DISCUSS)

Andy Newton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-14: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[Preserving Murray Kucherawy's previous DISCUSS position from -13 which still
applies to -14]

Section 5.2 declares a new registry, a range of which is controlled by
"Specification Required" rules.  RFC 8126, Section 4.6, says:

   As with Expert Review (Section 4.5), clear guidance to the designated
   expert should be provided when defining the registry, and thorough
   understanding of Section 5 is important.

Is no such advice in order here?





_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]