[manet] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traff ic-classification-15: (with DISCUSS)
Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <174299292978.1809107.3557197220989595896@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z> |
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification-15: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for resolving the security DISCUSS raised by Deb and my validation error concern. There are just a few small items left that need fixing. The figure in Section 2.1 makes it appear that a Traffic Classification Sub-Data Item is 32 bits in size, but Section 2.1.1 shows it is variable length of at least 64 bits (again using to to me unknown convention of ":" instead of "~") Also in the last two updates since my previous ballot, a new error appeared in table 2.2 and 2.3. The text "Must be one (1)" was replaced with "Sub-Data Item Type (1)" and the longer text moved the Length field marker to an incorrect place. Once these errors are fixed, I will resolve my DISCUSS. _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]