[manet] A partial response to <Re: Review draft-perkins-ma net-aodvv2-05>
"Charlie P." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Abdussalam and all, Prior to resubmission last year, I reviewed the comments I was able to find about AODVv2, plus some I had received by private email. All of those comments were addressed, except for the observation that AODVv2 needed to have a publicly available implementation for evaluation. And, now, there is an NS-3 implementation being made ready for general release. >From that standpoint, I would say that the document is ready for further review. Very recently, I received another question from the NS-3 implementation team. I expect to answer that question this week and summarize to the [manet] list. That might result in a minor update to the document, but just at this moment I do not foresee the need. Bottom line, I am pretty sure your review to the document will be beneficial, and I will provide additional information as it becomes available. Regards, Charlie P. -----Original Message----- From: Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]> Sent: May 4, 2025 1:51 PM To: Charlie Perkins <[email protected]> Cc: manet <[email protected]> Subject: Review draft-perkins-manet-aodvv2-05 Hi Charlie, and MANET WG I missed last meeting, but seen your presentation related to AODV. My question is that could we get a confirm from the authors that all issues raised by this WG related to AODVv2 [1] [2], were solved or recorded for future discussions? because I am not sure how can I review this work, or should we start from scratch as new review? As I mentioned before in my last meeting to this WG that I am willing to review/comment/discuss this WG related/presented docs. Best Regards AB [1] draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2 [2] draft-perkins-manet-aodvv2 _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]