[manet] Re: MANET WG Charter and MANET Internetworking

> Thanks for this Donald, but I feel we may need to reset this discussion
> somewhat

I most respectfully disagree, Fred.  I think Donald's text is pretty good.

Donald writes:

> The working group will analyze existing standard protocols and
> established practices to identify gaps in providing these services.

I read this as being carefully crafted to allow the WG to work on issues
other than the ones that are explicitly listed earlier in the text.  In
particular, if the WG thinks that using PI addresses and absence of
renumbering are important issues, then the above sentence allows us to
identify that as a gap and work on it.

> This naturally brings encapsulation, prefix delegation and DMM into the
> discussion.

Perhaps.  (I frankly don't know, I haven't thought about it.)

But whether this is the case or not, we must make sure that the charter is
not written so as to force a given solution.  And I understand that's what
Donald is trying to do.

-- Juliusz

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]