[manet] Re: A partial response to <Re: Review draft-perk ins-manet-aodvv2-05>

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 9:31 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Do you mean that AODVv2 is not implementable,
>
> I never said that.
>

That is good, so we this WG may say it is implementable and there is not a
big problem for this WG.


>
> Henning Rogge has a lot of experience implementing routing protocols.
> Henning Rogge does not know how to implement AODVv2 without resorting to
> a kernel module or using the default-to-self hack.
>

Ok, but I think we are talking her only about one OS and not in general,


>
> I have a moderate amount of experience implementing routing protocols.
> I have thought about the problem very hard, I have questioned both Henning
> and Charlie, and I still do not know how to implement AODVv2 without
> resorting to a kernel module or using the default-to-self hack.
>

There is a need of a discussion with conclusion, but I have not seen a fact
of real discussion getting to a clear conclusion.


>
> Hence, there are at least two people awith experience implementing routing
> protocols who do not know how to implement AODVv2 without resorting to
> a kernel module or using the default-to-self hack.
>
> This is not an opinion.  This is a fact.
>
>
IMHO, two or three are not the WG fact/opinion, so still is not a clear
fact, or clear direction.

The fact is that this issue needs discussions and answers from more
implementers, which then we can get a clear conclusion.
That fact that I want will need the assistant of our IETF AD which has more
relationships with other participants.

best regards
AB

> -- Juliusz
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]