[manet] Re: BABEL question
Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Jul 2025 23:39:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Section 2.5.6 of RFC4291 says: > > “Routers must not forward any packets with Link-Local source or > destination addresses to other links.” > Based on a cursory read of your BABEL proposal, You mean AHCP, right, not Babel? > it appears that all addressing is Link-Local unless or until a global > address becomes available and so the protocol is presumably doing > multihop forwarding of packets with LL source or destination > addresses. How do you resolve this apparent discontinuity > with the IPv6 addressing architecture? RFC 4291 deals with forwarding at the network layer, here they're being resent at the application layer. The operational difference is that the source/destination addresses in the IP header are regenerated every time. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]