[manet] Re: BABEL question
"Templin \(US\), Fred L" <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:21:51 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BN0P110MB1420375B57E14F44829D718BA35EA@BN0P110MB1420.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Hi Juliusz, > -----Original Message----- > From: Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 2:51 PM > To: Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]> > Cc: Henning Rogge <[email protected]>; [email protected] List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [manet] Re: BABEL question > > > Imagine a prefix like: "2001:db8:f000::/48" where the lower 16 bits of > > the /64 do not represent a subnet ID but instead identify a host route > > delegation service. > > I most respectfully disagree. > > I have no objection to defining a flat prefix of MANET interface > addresses. However, the prefix must be flat, as anything else is > gratuitious complexity that doesn't bring any practical benefits. Here I have to respectfully disagree - RFC9374 is an example of the type of IPv6 prefix I am postulating. Bits 28-63 of the prefix Identify administrative authorities responsible for keeping track of /128 addresses assigned from their portion of the prefix. The parent prefix 2001:30::/28 would make a good MLA candidate. > (Henning is right, by the way, a /64 is good enough. If I recall my > undergrad combinatorics correctly, a /64 gives a vanishingly small > probability of collision when the total number of nodes is less than > 4.2 billion. For a /48, the value is roughly 10¹².) Here again, the service I am suggesting is one where a registration authority keeps track of the /128 addresses provisioned from an IPv6 ::/N prefix for N <= 64. It is like a DHCPv6 service for host routes. Whether the host generates Its own /128 and then registers it with the registration authority, or whether the registration authority generates a /128 and provides it to the host is a small detail - they key thing is that there is a registration authority that vouches for the uniqueness of the address and the host's authorization to use it. Without such a registration authority, it is truly every node for itself and just a matter of statistical good luck that there will be no collisions. The two approaches are really the difference between responsible address administration and anarchy. Thank you - Fred > -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]