[manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-util ization-02.txt
Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:44:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnDZ8_J7sn08xh-UHio8ExguYYHhxyFsFP7YuDAWaAH3_332g@mail.gmail.com> |
I still did not get any reply this is I think a third reminder, best regards, AB On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:25 AM Abdussalam Baryun < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi draft-author and WG, > > My review AB-2 for the subject titled WG draft. > > Before any review just to say that this draft is not updating RFC8175, but > this is an extension draft. > > Firstly, this new draft has some changes due to reviewer-discuss, so I > would like to discuss with you those changes > > >Active Time:Time in nanoseconds since the channel has been in use > > I agree with the definition of active time within the table 1, so I think > this is the total time of the channel available for communication, so when > we change in the draft as define as *used* doesn't that mean busy channel. > If yes please amend because I think the table 1 should be consistent within > all draft > > This draft supports 8175, so the *dynamic-links* can be point-to-point or > shared medium as mentioned in RFC8175. > > > Abstract> > >This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol > (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel > > > AB>amend to>Abstract> > This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol > (DLEP) to provide the radio channel utilization tlv to the peer router. The radio > channel utilization provided measurements at the modem of the data plane > radio channel for the router awareness. > > AB>reason> the abstract is short, and it needs to specify the extension is > tlv_extension, and we need not to exclude that some MANET may use separate > data/control planes/channels per router-modems. > > > AB> > > > draft>section 1> introduction> > mentions the channel utilization (unicast traffic) between two routers, > so is it only point-to-point links this draft is specifying, Please > advise? > > >draft>section 1> > > >A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor > (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for > each DLEP neighbor. > > AB> amend> measurement how a radio channel time is used and how much time > resources are available > AB> reason> radio channel doesn't always/only mean time. > > AB>section 2> > A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor > (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for > each DLEP neighbor. > > AB> the channel usage will be reported per used-beam, because DLEP > neighbor may have two beams per one radio-channel. There is a spatial usage > added to the time resources. > > AB> does the draft consider the dynamic channel allocation issues? > AB> why not adding L1-channel/traffic type value? > > > Best Regards > > AB > > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:30 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt is now >> available. It is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) WG of >> the >> IETF. >> >> Title: DLEP Radio Channel Utilization Extension >> Author: Henning Rogge >> Name: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt >> Pages: 8 >> Dates: 2025-05-12 >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange >> Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel. >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02 >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: >> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ manet mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]