[manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-util ization-02.txt

Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:44:15 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.manet
Message-ID <CADnDZ8_J7sn08xh-UHio8ExguYYHhxyFsFP7YuDAWaAH3_332g@mail.gmail.com>
I still did not get any reply

this is I think a third reminder,

best regards,
AB

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:25 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi draft-author and WG,
>
> My review AB-2  for the subject titled WG draft.
>
> Before any review just to say that this draft is not updating RFC8175, but
> this is an extension draft.
>
> Firstly, this new draft has some changes due to reviewer-discuss, so I
> would like to discuss with you those changes
>
> >Active Time:Time in nanoseconds since the channel has been in use
>
> I agree with the definition of active time within the table 1, so I think
> this is the total time of the channel available for communication, so when
> we change in the draft as define as *used*  doesn't that mean busy channel.
> If yes please amend because I think the table 1 should be consistent within
> all draft
>
> This draft supports 8175, so the *dynamic-links* can be point-to-point or
> shared medium as mentioned in RFC8175.
>
> > Abstract>
> >This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol
> (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel
>
>
> AB>amend to>Abstract>
> This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol
> (DLEP) to provide the radio channel utilization tlv to the peer router. The radio
> channel utilization provided measurements at the modem of the data plane
> radio channel for the router awareness.
>
> AB>reason> the abstract is short, and it needs to specify the extension is
> tlv_extension, and  we need not to exclude that some MANET may use separate
> data/control planes/channels per router-modems.
>
>
> AB>
>
> > draft>section 1> introduction>
> mentions the channel utilization (unicast traffic) between two routers,
> so is it only point-to-point  links this draft is specifying, Please
> advise?
>
> >draft>section 1>
>
> >A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor
> (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for
> each DLEP neighbor.
>
> AB> amend>  measurement how a radio channel time is used and how much time
> resources are available
> AB> reason> radio channel doesn't always/only mean time.
>
> AB>section 2>
> A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor
> (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for
> each DLEP neighbor.
>
> AB> the channel usage will be reported per used-beam, because  DLEP
> neighbor may have two beams per one radio-channel. There is a spatial usage
> added to the time resources.
>
> AB> does the draft consider the dynamic channel allocation issues?
> AB> why not adding L1-channel/traffic type value?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> AB
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:30 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt is now
>> available. It is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) WG of
>> the
>> IETF.
>>
>>    Title:   DLEP Radio Channel Utilization Extension
>>    Author:  Henning Rogge
>>    Name:    draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt
>>    Pages:   8
>>    Dates:   2025-05-12
>>
>> Abstract:
>>
>>    This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
>>    Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel.
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization/
>>
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.html
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]