[manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-util ization-02.txt

Still no reply,

This is fourth reminder

AB

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 9:44 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I still did not get any reply
>
> this is I think a third reminder,
>
> best regards,
> AB
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:25 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi draft-author and WG,
>>
>> My review AB-2  for the subject titled WG draft.
>>
>> Before any review just to say that this draft is not updating RFC8175,
>> but this is an extension draft.
>>
>> Firstly, this new draft has some changes due to reviewer-discuss, so I
>> would like to discuss with you those changes
>>
>> >Active Time:Time in nanoseconds since the channel has been in use
>>
>> I agree with the definition of active time within the table 1, so I think
>> this is the total time of the channel available for communication, so when
>> we change in the draft as define as *used*  doesn't that mean busy channel.
>> If yes please amend because I think the table 1 should be consistent within
>> all draft
>>
>> This draft supports 8175, so the *dynamic-links* can be point-to-point or
>> shared medium as mentioned in RFC8175.
>>
>> > Abstract>
>> >This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
>> Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel
>>
>>
>> AB>amend to>Abstract>
>> This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol
>> (DLEP) to provide the radio channel utilization tlv to the peer router. The radio
>> channel utilization provided measurements at the modem of the data plane
>> radio channel for the router awareness.
>>
>> AB>reason> the abstract is short, and it needs to specify the extension
>> is tlv_extension, and  we need not to exclude that some MANET may use
>> separate data/control planes/channels per router-modems.
>>
>>
>> AB>
>>
>> > draft>section 1> introduction>
>> mentions the channel utilization (unicast traffic) between two routers,
>> so is it only point-to-point  links this draft is specifying, Please
>> advise?
>>
>> >draft>section 1>
>>
>> >A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor
>> (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for
>> each DLEP neighbor.
>>
>> AB> amend>  measurement how a radio channel time is used and how much
>> time resources are available
>> AB> reason> radio channel doesn't always/only mean time.
>>
>> AB>section 2>
>> A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor
>> (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for
>> each DLEP neighbor.
>>
>> AB> the channel usage will be reported per used-beam, because  DLEP
>> neighbor may have two beams per one radio-channel. There is a spatial usage
>> added to the time resources.
>>
>> AB> does the draft consider the dynamic channel allocation issues?
>> AB> why not adding L1-channel/traffic type value?
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> AB
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:30 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt is now
>>> available. It is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) WG of
>>> the
>>> IETF.
>>>
>>>    Title:   DLEP Radio Channel Utilization Extension
>>>    Author:  Henning Rogge
>>>    Name:    draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt
>>>    Pages:   8
>>>    Dates:   2025-05-12
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>
>>>    This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
>>>    Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel.
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization/
>>>
>>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.html
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>
>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> manet mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>
>>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]