[manet] Re: Problems and Gaps (was: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Extended: Call for adoption: draft-templin-manet -inet-05)

Hi Fred,

Thanks for your work, sorry that I still did not get time to respond much
on the list, but will try in the close future, my comment below

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 5:53 PM Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Lou, I suspect if you asked 20 random IETFers what is meant by “problem”
> and what is meant by “gap” you would get 20 different answers. Still, those
> terms turn up in published RFCs all the time – for example, RFC9365 talks
> about “problems” and RFC7429 talks about “gaps” and the editors of those
> documents got to apply their own interpretations of what is meant by the
> terms.
>
>
>

I agree with you, but I think that the problem statement should only
mention the problems, however, I will leave it to the authors and at last
call discussions. However, I think we need to complete the technical
solution issues before talking into texts or use of words, so I suggest let
problem statement as it is, and work on the solution draft.

best regards
AB

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]