[manet] Re: L2/L3 MANETs (Re: Re: I-D Action: draft- ietf-manet-inet-gap-analysis-04.txt)
"Templin \(US\), Fred L" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.manet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BNZP110MB244756DA87C57C562E41910EA3DAA@BNZP110MB2447.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Hi AB,
I do not mind reverting the definition of MANET router to the version that appeared in the -03:
“MANET Router
a node that runs a routing protocol over one or more MANET
interfaces to establish multihop forwarding paths within a local
routing region.”
OK for you?
Thank you - Fred
From: Abdussalam Baryun <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2026 3:39 AM
To: Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: L2/L3 MANETs (Re: [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-inet-gap-analysis-04.txt)
EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 4:45 PM Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi AB, now that the subject is out in the open I am not willing to walk back the distinction the draft now makes between L2/L3 MANETs. You in the past have argued for keeping things together in one draft instead of splitting into multiple.
not sure of past discussions sorry, but please amend the manet_router definition or reply with your suggestion
AB
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]