Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-22: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mboned |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-22: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I support Mirja's Discuss ballot point on IANA.
In addition, I have a few comments.
I'm looking in the Introduction for an unambiguous statement as to whether this
mechanism can be initiated by a source, and I'm not seeing one. Just based on
the Introduction, I'm guessing not, but the Introduction starts by mentioning
that it's difficult to trace from the source, so I'm confused.
In section 3, I'm seeing
If an
implementation receives an unknown TLV type for the first TLV in a
message (i.e., the header TLV), it SHOULD ignore and silently discard
the entire packet. If an implementation receives an unknown TLV type
for a subsequent TLV within a message, it SHOULD ignore and silently
discard the entire packet.
and trying to understand why these two cases are listed separately. I'm also
trying to understand why they're SHOULDs, but please help me understand the
differences you have in mind.
I share the question about mixing IPv4 and IPv6.
Is the last sentence in
Upstream Router Address: 32 bits
This field specifies the address of the upstream router from which
this router expects packets from this source. This may be a
multicast group (e.g., ALL-[protocol]-ROUTERS group) if the
upstream router is not known because of the workings of the
multicast routing protocol. However, it should be 0 if the
incoming interface address is unknown or unnumbered.
normative?
_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned