Re: MBONED Digest, Vol 134, Issue 10
"James A. (Jim) Stevens" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mboned |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH8Jh6BOT8cmirE1eWt5U-YxV9i7-sMAyD5FgGzMt7eOJpOj_Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Toerless, we are using Bidir-PIM. I haven't been tracking RFC 8364, but from just glancing at it, I think Bidir-PIM is probably better for these bursty source/destination multicast applications as well as being an existing standard available in some routers and host operating systems. Doesn't mean I couldn't change my opinion as I learn more and it becomes widely available, however. Cheers, Jim On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, James, Tim > > Agreed. That additional text in the abstract didn't add good value *sigh* > > Can i ask whether you are using PIM-SM or Bidir-PIM for these type of apps > ? > Always particularily curious about how well PIM-SM with bursty sources > does work well (or not) in different scenarios. E.g: Do you think that > > RFC 8364 would work equally well for your app environment ? > > Cheers > Toerless > > _______________________________________________ MBONED mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned