Re: RFC 8487 port assignment
"Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Feb 2019 21:00:16 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mboned |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DB7PR07MB47455235220EFB67666098A091690@DB7PR07MB4745.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> |
Resending, including the entire WG to consider below questions... Regards Hooman From: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 4:42 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RFC 8487 port assignment Dear all IANA has assigned port 33435 for RFC 8487 mtracev2 this port also coincides with Linux unicast traceroute. Actually if you look at this UDP port in IANA you will see it for both unix trace route and mtracev2. Would this cause some issues from implementation point of view? Do we need to reconsider the port to be outside of Linux traceroute port range? Regards Hooman _______________________________________________ MBONED mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned